content of the article
SYDNEY – Australia’s antitrust authorities blocked an asset transfer deal between Telstra and TPG, the country’s leading and second-largest wireless internet companies, citing competition concerns, paving the way for a lawsuit over access to four million customers.
In a deal announced in May, Telstra Group would buy spectrum – radio waves that carry wireless internet – and cell towers from TPG Telecom Ltd, while TPG would continue to sell 4G and 5G coverage over Telstra’s future infrastructure. They did not give any financial details.
advertising 2
content of the article
content of the article
But Optus, the No. 3 mobile operator owned by Singapore Telecommunications, rejected the deal, saying it would build Telstra’s market dominance.
Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) ruled against the plan on Wednesday, saying it would “pose a real risk that TPG and Optus would invest less in critical infrastructure”.
Telstra and TPG said they will appeal the ACCC’s decision, which they described as disappointing and a missed opportunity for the 17% of Australia’s 25 million people who would be affected by the merger.
The decision ushers in a second legal showdown between TPG and the ACCC in just over two years. The ACCC blocked TPG’s acquisition of Vodafone Hutchison Australia, only for the federal court to overrule and allow the transaction to proceed in 2020.
advertising 3
content of the article
This is a bright spot for Optus, which has faced heavy criticism, including from the federal government, after it reported a data breach in October that affected around 10 million customer accounts.
“By striking back this deal, the ACCC has helped our regional communities continue to benefit from competition,” Optus CEO Kelly Bayer Rosemary said in a statement.
Shares in Telstra, which already has the most customers in most of Australia’s major internet and telecoms markets, were flat, while shares in TPG were down 3% through mid-Wednesday session, while the broader market was down 1.3% gained weight
“An unsuccessful appeal to the Australian Competition Court could have longer-term … implications for our EBITDA projections, apart from the impact of potential additional investments required to upgrade regional networks,” UBS analysts wrote in a note to clients about TPG.
advertising 4
content of the article
Paul Budde, an independent telecoms analyst, said the ACCC decision shows that Australia’s competition regulation is not keeping pace with commercial reality, as it focuses on ownership of infrastructure rather than services.
“You could say that the ACCC failed to move in that direction, or you could argue that the industry should have pushed for a comprehensive review of telecoms regulation,” he said in an email.
“Industry and the ACCC need to come together and come up with a new regulatory regime that takes reality into account,” he added. (Reporting by Navya Mittal and Savyata Mishra in Bengaluru; Editing by Anil D’Silva, Shinjini Ganguli, Uttaresh.V and Muralikumar Anantharaman)
